Study Overview and Methodology

Tropical forests across Latin America, Africa, and Southeast Asia stored 247 gigatons of carbon — more than 30 years' worth of current emissions from fossil fuels use — in the early 2000s, according to a comprehensive assessment of the world's carbon stocks.

The research, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences by an international team of scientists, used data from 4,079 plot sites around the world and satellite-based measurements to estimate that forests store 193 billion tons of carbon in their vegetation and 54 billion tons in their roots structure.

The study has produced a carbon map for 2.5 billion ha (6.2 billion acres) of forests. The integration of ground-based inventory data with satellite remote sensing measurements allowed the researchers to produce spatially explicit estimates of carbon stocks at a resolution that had not previously been achievable across such a large area.

Regional Distribution of Forest Carbon

According to the study, forests in Latin America account for 49 percent of the total carbon stock, followed by forests of Southeast Asia (26 percent), and Africa (25 percent).

The dominant share of carbon in Latin American forests reflects the enormous extent and carbon density of the Amazon basin, which represents the largest continuous area of tropical rainforest on Earth. The high carbon density of Southeast Asian forests, particularly in Indonesia and Malaysia, reflects both the tall, biomass-rich dipterocarp forests of Borneo and Sumatra and the carbon-rich peatland soils beneath lowland swamp forests.

African tropical forests, particularly those of the Congo basin, hold the third largest regional share of tropical forest carbon. These forests have historically received less international conservation attention than their counterparts in the Amazon and Southeast Asia, but their importance for global carbon stocks — and the need for sustained international investment in their protection — is underscored by the new mapping data.

Country-Level Findings

Brazil's forests accounted for nearly a quarter of total biomass measured in the study. Democratic Republic of Congo (9.8 percent), Indonesia (9.3 percent), Peru (4.9 percent), and Colombia (4.1 percent) rounded out the top five countries, which together accounted for more than half (52.8 percent) of tropical forest biomass.

The concentration of tropical forest carbon in a small number of countries has important implications for international climate policy. It means that the forest conservation policies of Brazil, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Indonesia are of global significance, and that targeted bilateral agreements with these countries represent a cost-effective approach to securing large quantities of forest carbon.

Countries outside the top five also hold significant shares of tropical forest carbon. Peru and Colombia together hold nearly 9 percent of the total, reflecting the enormous extent and high carbon density of Amazonian forests within their borders. Countries in West and Central Africa, while individually smaller, collectively hold substantial carbon stocks that are increasingly threatened by agricultural expansion.

Policy Implications for REDD+

The benchmark map can also be used to assist countries in assessing the carbon emissions that are likely to be avoided by implementing different policies and programs aimed at reducing deforestation and forest degradation at regional and project scales.

The map will assist developing country governments, land managers, policy makers, and civil society to become more informed about the likely result of their policies and programs in reducing national greenhouse gas emissions from the land-use sector.

For REDD+ specifically, the carbon map provides the spatial baseline needed to establish national reference emission levels — the benchmarks against which future deforestation reductions are measured for the purposes of results-based payments. Countries that can demonstrate measurable reductions in their deforestation rate below the reference level are eligible for REDD+ finance, and the accuracy of this accounting depends critically on the quality of the underlying carbon data.

The public availability of the carbon map also supports transparency and accountability in forest governance. When independent researchers and civil society organisations can access the same carbon data as governments, it becomes harder to conceal or misrepresent changes in forest cover and carbon stocks. This transparency is a precondition for the integrity of the REDD+ mechanism and for public trust in the results-based payments it generates.

Citation: Sassan Saatchi et al (2011). Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. PNAS June 3, 2011.